|
Post by account_disabled on Dec 12, 2023 8:03:19 GMT
If they remove all the links and remove all the names and all the bylines, then your hard earned work is effectively being taken advantage of, even though Google is no longer the true arbiter of whether traffic goes to that article. Internal links become syndicated links. On the other hand, if they don't remove the attribution, all the internal links you originally had in that article to other pages on your site will now become syndicated links. Which is what Google has historically gone after. Link scheme. In C Level Contact List the same case, it’s not just the intention behind negative SEO campaigns. That's what it does to your data, because if someone syndicates one of your articles, let's say there's a link to some other internal page, and syndicates it to a website, then you get a new Content internal links are now external links to your website. In fact, we do know that a couple of fairly powerful brands got into trouble a few years ago for syndicating their news content to other news sites. Now I'm not saying that negative SEO will necessarily trigger the same penalties, but it's possible. Even if it doesn't trigger a penalty, it could potentially pollute your link data. There are some other types of negative SEO that don’t really get discussed. Malware links not tracked in For example, if you have any kind of user-generated content on your site, such as if you have comments, even if you don't follow those comments, the links contained within them could lead to things like malware.
|
|